System and method for tracking resources during parallel processing

ABSTRACT

The present invention is directed to a parallel processing infrastructure, which enables the robust design of task scheduler(s) and communication primitive(s). This is achieved, in one embodiment of the present invention, by decomposing the general problem of exploiting parallelism into three parts. First, an infrastructure is provided to track resources. Second, a method is offered by which to expose the tracking of the aforementioned resources to task scheduler(s) and communication primitive(s). Third, a method is established by which task scheduler(s) in turn may enable and/or disable communication primitive(s). In this manner, an improved parallel processing infrastructure is provided.

RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims priority to co-pending U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/888,414 entitled “A PARALLEL PROCESSINGINFRASTRUCTURE” filed on Feb. 6, 2007 and co-pending U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/888,446 entitled “A PARALLEL PROCESSINGINFRASTRUCTURE” filed on Feb. 6, 2007, both of which are incorporatedherein by reference in their entirety.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material,which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has noobjection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patentdisclosure, as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patentfiles or records, but otherwise the copyright owner reserves allcopyright rights whatsoever.

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention generally relates to parallel processing and moreparticularly relates to systems and methods for tracking resourcesduring parallel processing.

2. Related Art

Parallel processing engages the concurrent use of multiple processors tosolve large computational problems. Since solving large problems oftenrequires significant time with a single processor, parallel processingallows such problems to be distributed amongst multiple processors, witheach of which solving only a portion of the problem in a fraction of thetime.

However, parallel processing presents significant challenges. Forexample, a complex task scheduler is required to efficiently distributeproblem components between the multiple processors, memory resourcesmust be properly allocated and shared, and messages must pass betweenthe processors.

However, conventional task schedulers are inadequate for efficientparallel processing. Conventional task schedulers perform twofunctions: 1) tracking of resources, and 2) providing the policies bywhich tasks are mapped to, and hence evaluated by, resources.Unfortunately, in conventional task schedulers no clear delineationexists between tracking resources, on one hand, and the manner by whichthose resources are utilized, on the other. This means that aconventional task scheduler, once online, must always be online. Thisresults in conventional parallel processing that is limited to only asingle session, which also must always be online. This also results inconventional parallel processing that operates with a single set ofpolicies within the single session.

One proposed solution is to invoke multiple sessions, each running adistinct task scheduler and implementing a different set of policies.This method is highly disadvantageous since 1) there may be a longlatency time involved in obtaining the resources in the first place whenthe session is invoked, and 2) there is no guarantee that anothersession will not seize some or all of the resources the new sessionneeds during that open time window between when the first session iskilled and the new session is invoked. Thus, any solution that requiresthat sessions compete with each other for the same resources willsignificantly decrease the efficiency of the overall parallel processingsystem.

Another proposed solution is to work within the bounds of the tightlycoupled, single session/single task scheduler/single policy scenario,but to augment the task scheduler's policy to take into account the newrequirements. This method is also highly disadvantageous because thepolicy enforced by a task scheduler is already highly complex. Forexample, it must account for race conditions as a result of prematureterminations, among other things. Because of the highly complex natureof the policy, a solution that requires the policy to be even morecomplex is highly undesirable, especially when the new policy istangential or even incompatible with the existing policy.

Therefore, what is needed is a system and method that overcomes thesesignificant problems found in conventional parallel processing systemsas described above.

SUMMARY

The present invention provides parallel processing systems and methodsthat enable single session parallel processing with multiple taskschedulers implementing multiple policies and communicating with eachother via communication primitives. This is achieved, in one embodimentof the present invention, by decomposing the general problem ofexploiting parallelism into three parts. First, an infrastructure isprovided to track resources. Second, a method that exposes the trackingof the aforementioned resources to task scheduler(s) and communicationprimitive(s) is defined. Third, a method is provided by which taskscheduler(s), in turn, may enable and/or disable communicationprimitive(s).

In one embodiment, the fundamental concepts of tracking resources andutilizing resources are de-coupled or separated into two modules: atracker and a task scheduler/evaluator. The tracker is always onlineduring a session. The task scheduler manages the execution of acollection of tasks using a collection of resources and is capable ofgoing online or offline within a single session (i.e., the taskscheduler can obtain and release resources).

In operation, after a session is invoked, any task scheduler can comeonline (i.e., request available resources from the tracker). The taskscheduler then manages the execution of tasks using those availableresources, and when done, it goes offline (i.e., releases theresources). Another task scheduler may also come online in the samesession, obtain the same or different resources used by a previous taskscheduler, and utilize those resources in a completely different way(i.e. under completely different policy guidelines).

The separation defined above enables the following possibilities: 1) itallows for a simpler implementation of the task schedulers; and 2) itallows for a tight coupling between a task scheduler and thecommunication primitives that the tasks, managed by the aforementionedtask scheduler, may use when communicating. The task schedulers can beimplemented more simply because each task scheduler has a more narrowlyfocused, discrete policy.

The tight coupling between a task scheduler and the communicationprimitives prevents a whole class of deadlocks from occurring.Typically, these deadlocks occur when a mismatch exists between thepolices by which any task scheduler handles premature termination oftasks, and the functionality implemented in terms of the communicationprimitives. As an example, consider the situation where a task schedulerrelaunches a task in the event of premature termination. This taskrelaunch is predicated on it not being able to communicate with anyother task.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, the separationabove, and the functionality it enables, provides: (a) the ability toenable and disable non-tracker functionality; (b) the ability to filterout stale messages (e.g., messages meant for one incarnation of adestination cannot be delivered to another incarnation of the samedestination); (c) the ability to migrate resources; and (d) the abilityto re-launch resources in situ (i.e., without having to coordinate there-launch with any other entity).

In one embodiment, resources are managed using a star (backbone)topology. The center of the backbone is termed the Hub. The peripheriesof the backbone are termed the Spokes. Furthermore, spoke resources canbe migrated between hubs for more efficient parallel processing usingthe hierarchical star topology.

Other features and advantages of the present invention will become morereadily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art after reviewingthe following detailed description and accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The details of the present invention, both as to its structure andoperation, may be gleaned in part by studying the accompanying drawings,in which like reference numerals, refer to like parts, and in which:

FIG. 1A is a schematic block diagram representation of an exampleparallel hardware system composed of a set of physical machinesaccording to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 1B shows an example of how each physical machine may be used toexecute a set of virtual machines according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 1C shows the two fundamental concepts of Parallel Processing, andConcurrent Processing according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 2A shows an example of a schematic block diagram representing avirtual machine that includes a virtual process that comprises twophysical processes according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2B shows an example of the two fundamental types of schedulersaccording to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3A is a signal diagram that shows an example parallel processinginfrastructure according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3B is a block diagram that shows an example of the attributes of aresource over time within a session according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 4 provides a high level overview of an example tracker, and how itinteracts in a system that allows for the definition and implementationof task schedulers and task evaluators according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 5A is a block diagram that illustrates each level of an examplebackbone hierarchical topology according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 5B is a block diagram that illustrates an example the secondarytopology according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5C is a block diagram that illustrates an example of a hierarchicalbackbone topology according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6A is a block diagram of an example session according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6B is a block diagram of an example session of a task scheduleraccording to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6C is a block diagram of an example session of a task evaluatoraccording to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6D is a block diagram of an example session of a task evaluatorcalling a task scheduler according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 7A is a block diagram that illustrates an example of the sequenceof events that enable a task scheduler to come online, schedule, andwhen done, go offline according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 7B is a block diagram that illustrates an example of the sequenceof events that enable a task evaluator to come online, evaluate, whendone, go offline, and finally report the task's status back to the taskscheduler according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8A is a block diagram that illustrates an example of how a Hubinteracts with its Spokes according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 8B is a block diagram that illustrates an example of how a parentHub migrates a Spoke to one of its child Hub according to an embodimentof the present invention;

FIG. 8C is a block diagram that illustrates an example of how a resourceis migrated from a Hub to another Hub according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 9 is a block diagram that depicts an example of the manner in whicha resource is launched, and if need be, relaunched according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an example computer system thatmay be used in connection with various embodiments described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Certain embodiments as disclosed herein provide a parallel processinginfrastructure with a resource tracking method and system. This isachieved, in one embodiment of the present invention, by decomposing thegeneral problem of exploiting parallelism into three parts. First, aninfrastructure is provided to track resources. Second, a method thatexposes the tracking of the aforementioned resources to taskscheduler(s) and communication primitive(s) is defined. Third, a methodis provided by which task scheduler(s), in turn, may enable and/ordisable communication primitive(s).

The parallel processing infrastructure can be utilized in a number ofenvironments, including an architecture with multiple processors, adistributed computing environment, a global network of processors, orany other environment where it is desirable to subdivide the executionof a computer program between multiple processors.

After reading this description, skilled practitioners in the art willappreciate how to implement the invention in various alternativeembodiments and alternative applications. However, although variousembodiments of the present invention will be described herein, it isunderstood that these embodiments are presented by way of example only,and not limitation. As such, this detailed description of variousalternative embodiments should not be construed in any way to limit thescope or breadth of the present invention as set forth in the appendedclaims.

Skilled practitioners will further appreciate that the variousillustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm stepsdescribed in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can oftenbe implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, orcombinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability ofhardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules,circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms oftheir functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented ashardware or software depends upon the particular application and designconstraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled persons can implementthe described functionality in varying ways for each particularapplication, but such implementation decisions should not be interpretedas causing a departure from the scope of the invention. In addition, thegrouping of functions within a module, block, circuit or step is forease of description. Specific functions or steps can be moved from onemodule, block or circuit without departing from the invention.

FIG. 1A shows a schematic block diagram representative of a parallelhardware system composed of a set of physical machines (120, 130, 140,150, 160) interconnected via a physical inter-machine topology (110). Inthe illustrated embodiment, each physical machine may have one or morephysical processors, and the machines or individual processors can beconnected to each other via an intra-machine topology (170) or aninter-machine topology 110 as appropriate.

Each physical machine may be used to execute a set of virtual machines,as depicted in FIG. 1B; thus giving rise to two fundamental concepts,depicted in FIG. 1C, Parallel Processing, and Concurrent Processing.Parallel Processing refers to the mapping of a single virtual processoron a single physical processor. Concurrent Processing refers to mappingmultiple virtual processors on a single physical processor. For thepurposes of this description, the term parallel processing shall referto both Parallel Processing and Concurrent Processing.

Note that all physical machines need not be identical. So, in thecontext of Parallel Processing, for example, machine 120 contains onlyone physical processor, and therefore would execute only one virtualmachine 180, as depicted in FIG. 1B. Machine 150, on the other hand,contains multiple physical processors, and therefore, may potentiallyexecute many virtual machines.

FIG. 2A shows a schematic block diagram representing a virtual machine(201) that includes a virtual process that comprises two physicalprocesses: (a) shadow process (202), and (b) resource process (203). Theshadow process controls launching, and if need be, relaunching of theresource process. The resource process comprises at least two physicalthreads; the first two of which are labeled main (204) and daemon (205),respectively. Note that in one embodiment, all resources (a collectionof virtual machines, or a collection of virtual threads within a virtualmachine) are tracked using a star (backbone) topology. The center of thebackbone is termed the Hub. The peripheries of the backbone are termedthe Spokes.

There are two fundamental types of schedulers, as depicted in FIG. 2B:ones that schedule tasks across a collection of virtual machines (208),and ones that schedule tasks across a collection of virtual threadswithin a virtual machine (209). Note that in both cases, the fundamentalunit of execution, and hence resource, is the virtual thread (206).Furthermore, each, except the first, virtual thread is shadowed by ashadow thread (207). The role of the shadow thread is analogous to therole played by the shadow process; namely, to launch and, if need be,relaunch physical threads that make up a virtual thread. In other words,the first virtual thread is shadowed by the shadow process, while therest of the virtual threads are shadowed by their respective shadowthreads. The reason for this distinction: a virtual process bydefinition must have at least one virtual thread. Since a virtualprocess already has a shadow process monitoring it, the first virtualthread need not be shadowed by a shadow thread. For the purposes of thisdescription, unless specified otherwise, we shall refer to therespective shadows as simply Shadows.

FIG. 3A is a signal diagram that shows an example parallel processinginfrastructure according to one embodiment of the present invention. Inthe illustrated embodiment, the two main functionalities—task schedulers(306A, 306B, 306C) and the tracker (310)—are shown within a singlesession that starts at time 302 and concludes at time 303. The trackerfunctionality comes online once (309), and comes offline once (311).However, task schedulers, unlike the tracker, may come online andoffline numerous times (306A, 306B, 306C). Note that in each such case,the manner by which resources are utilized may differ. As an example,306A may utilize the first and up to ten resources made available, andignore the rest (if any). 306B, on the other hand, may not startscheduling until it has four resources available, and utilizes more if,and when, they become available. Finally, 306C may utilize resources inincrements of, for example, five.

Regardless of the manner by which the resources are utilized, note thatthe tracker tracks each resource in terms of three attributes: (a)ID.Resource—a number that is unique across all resources, (b)ID.Reincarnation.Resource—a number that is unique across allreincarnations of a particular resource, and (c) ID.Reincarnation.Link—anumber that is unique across all reincarnations of the link between eachresource and its Hub. As a result, task scheduler 306C, for example, maylimit itself to using a specific set of resources utilized at some pointin the past (at, say time 312). For example, consider some resource withattributes 314 of ID.Resource=64, ID.Reincarnation.Resource=29 andID.Reincarnation.Link=1, respectively, at time 312, as depicted in FIG.3B. The same resource at time 313 can have only one of three sets ofattributes (assuming the resource still exists): (a) attributes 315—theresource is the same incarnation as found at time 312, (b) attributes316—the resource is some new incarnation that followed the one at time312, or (c) attributes 317—the resource is the same incarnation as foundat time 312, but was migrated by some task scheduler (running on thecurrent resource) to another task scheduler (running on some otherresource), and back. Needless to say, details on how migration takesplace, and how the respective values are computed will be covered later.

FIG. 4 provides a high level overview of an example tracker 401, and howit interacts in a system that allows for the definition andimplementation of task schedulers and task evaluators (402A, 402B). Thetracker 401 is executed on the daemon thread, while the task schedulersare invoked and tasks are evaluated on the main thread.

The functionality of each task scheduler and evaluator, labeled Athrough T, is defined in terms of modules meant to be executed on themain thread (403A through 403T) and the daemon thread (404A through404T). Task functionality common across all task schedulers andevaluators are defined in the Task Kernel sub-modules (405 and 406 onthe main and daemon thread, respectively). Furthermore, whereapplicable, all the task scheduler/evaluator modules labeled A through T(on both the main and daemon threads) control access to communicationprimitives that the respective tasks may use when communicating withinthe virtual thread, or across virtual threads. To provide fine-graincontrol over the directions these communication primitives (labeled408A/B/C/D) may have, their access is controlled by the scheduler orevaluator sub-modules (labeled 409A/B/C/D).

Note that not all task scheduler/evaluator modules need to providecommunication primitives, as illustrated by task scheduler/evaluator A;in such cases, since no communication primitives are defined, taskscannot communication with any other entity. Moreover, note that thecommunication primitives defined in Task Kernel and Tracker modules(405, 406, 401) are inaccessible to both the callers of task schedulersand the callees of task evaluators.

One advantage of this framework is that it permits direct invocation ofany task scheduler (labeled 403A through 403T) on the Hub. At the sametime, it allows for the reception of any task on the Spoke without aprior knowledge (labeled 411). One consequence of this layout: each taskscheduler sub-module on the main thread must define its own event loopto route all incoming messages. This, in turn, means the communicationprimitives (labeled 408A) meant to be executed on the main thread at theHub must be designed so that they may only reply to a message, orprocess any incoming message; i.e. they may not initiate a message, orwait for a specific message. The details of how a task scheduler isinvoked on the Hub, and how a task is evaluated on the Spoke shall becovered later.

The tracker module, 401, has four sets of links. The first one, 413A, isto the main thread. The second one, 413B, is to the Shadow. The third,413C, (set of links) connect with the Spokes (if any). The fourth, 413D,connects with the Hub (if any). The link 413A is created when the daemonthread is created. The details of how the last three types of links areset up and utilized will be covered later. Note that links with the mainthread (413A), shadow (413B), and Hub—in case of a Spoke—(413D) mustalways be online for the virtual thread to be in existence. If for anyreason, any one of these links are offline (i.e. non operational), thetracker module would close down all four sets of links, and selfdestruct the virtual thread.

However, links to Spokes (413C) are handled with special care by theTracker module (401); it propagates any change in status of the links(413C) to the Task Kernel module 406. Details on what constituents astatus report shall be covered later.

Any suitable form of communication may be used, such as, for example,pipes, signals, message queues, semaphores, shared memory, sockets, orany other suitable form, as the invention is not limited in thisrespect. In addition, any suitable network protocol or protocols may beused as the invention is not limited in this respect either. Forexample, in some embodiments, the TCP/IP protocol may be used, eventhough the communications are not necessarily traveling over theinter-machine topology.

The scheduler portion of the Task Kernel module 406 is the recipient ofall status reports from the Tracker module 401, which, in turn, forwardsthe status reports to (a) the scheduler portion of the Task Kernelmodule 405—if some task scheduler is online on the main thread; and (b)all communication primitives, say, 408C (on the daemon thread) thatwould like to have access to said status reports regardless of whethersome task scheduler is online (on the main thread) or not, as depictedin FIG. 4 (410). The later can be leverage by any communicationprimitive that provides, for example, parallel lock functionalityacross, say, many virtual processes. In this case, the parallel lockfunctionality implemented by the communication primitive needs to trackresources regardless of whether any task scheduler is online or not.Note that in another embodiment, the Task Kernel module 406 can definethe exact order in which all communication primitives 408C are notifiedof the status reports.

The tracker functionality tracks resources by way of a (backbone)hierarchical topology (an example topology of the present invention).FIG. 5A is a block diagram showing each level in the (backbone)hierarchical topology. The center of the backbone is termed a Hub (501).The peripheries of the backbone are termed the Spokes (502A, 502B, 502C,502D). Furthermore, the task schedulers are invoked on the Hub, whilethe tasks are evaluated at the Spokes.

The tasks may communicate using the existing backbone topology, 503, ormay utilize the secondary topology, 504, as depicted in FIG. 5B. In someembodiments, the creation and deletion of the secondary topology isguided by, and whose usage, including direction, is enabled and disabledby, the task scheduler that is online at the Hub. This is achieved byaugmenting the existing framework in three ways: (a) definition of thevirtual thread is augmented to include a new (separate) thread analogousto the daemon thread, but one whose Tracker module would create, manage,and route messages meant for link(s) in the secondary topology; (b) theTracker module (401) is augmented to include a link to theaforementioned (new) thread; and (c) the task/evaluator modules (Athrough T) on all threads are augmented to provide access tocommunication primitives meant for secondary topology. In someembodiments, the framework can be further augmented to support manysecondary topologies. Nevertheless, the pertinent point is this: thereshould be a tight coupling between a task scheduler/evaluator and thecommunication primitives that the tasks may use.

FIG. 5C depicts the set up of a hierarchal backbone topology. Forexample, Hub A, 505, tracks a collection of resources (that are itsspokes); one of which is Spoke S, 506. Spoke S, in turn, is also a Hub(Hub B—507). This recursive definition of Spokes also becoming Hubs isachieved in a well-defined manner, and as depicted in FIG. 6D. Normally,each Spoke is assigned a task by its Hub, which then gets evaluated.However, hierarchal topology is created when a Spoke is assigned a taskwhose evaluation results in the invocation of some task scheduler, asdepicted in 605 (FIG. 6D).

To summarize, at any moment in time 601 (FIG. 6A), each node within ahierarchal backbone topology is one whose main thread is either (a)offline; (b) executing a task scheduler, as depicted in FIG. 6B—this isonly possible at the one/only root node of the hierarchical backbonetopology; (c) executing a task evaluator, as depicted in FIG. 6C; or (d)executing a task evaluator which in turn has evoked a task scheduler, asdepicted in FIG. 6D. Furthermore, a task evaluator may invoke multipletask schedulers before concluding as long as they are one after theother, as depicted in 606 (FIG. 6D).

The previous discussion has detailed how the tracking functionality inparallel processing is decoupled from the task scheduling and taskevaluation functionalities, and has also described the general frameworkthrough which the task schedulers interact with the tracker. Next to bedescribed are four abilities that enable efficient and robust resourcetracking.

Ability to Enable and Disable Non-Tracker Functionality

FIG. 7A illustrates the sequence of events that enable a task schedulerto come online, schedule, and when done, go offline, at a Hub. Uponinvocation (701) of some Task Scheduler, say, T, on the main thread (asdepicted by 403T in FIG. 4), four steps are taken.

First (702): (a) the corresponding communication primitives labeled 408Aare enabled by making them publicly accessible by way of the API labeled409A; (b) the scheduler sub-module of the Task Kernel on the main threadlabeled 405 is invoked; the return value of which is the initialsnapshot of the resources tracked by the Tracker (401). Furthermore,from this point on, Task Kernel module 406 would send messagescontaining incremental status reports (from the Tracker 401) over thelink 413A.

Second (705), the scheduling of tasks using resources made available bythe Tracker (401) is commenced. Third (706), when done scheduling oftasks, all non-Tracker scheduling functionality (on both the main anddaemon threads) is deactivated. Note that one side-effect of this is thedisabling of the propagation of status reports (from the Tracker 401) byway of Task Kernel module 406. Finally (707), the scheduler sub-module403T returns back to the caller.

Expanding on the invocation of the scheduler sub-module of the Taskkernel (405) in the first step, a blocked message is sent to thescheduler sub-module of the Task Kernel on the daemon thread (labeled406) over the link 413A. Up on receiving the message, the schedulerperforms acts labeled 703 and 704; namely, the scheduler activates thescheduler sub-module of module Task T (labeled 404T) and thecorresponding communication primitives (labeled 409C), and activates theforwarding of status reports from the Tracker over the link 413A to thescheduler sub-module of Task T module (403T). The reply contains thecurrent snapshot of the status reports of all the resources tracked bythe Tracker (401).

Note that each entry in the status reports corresponds to the tuple(ID.Resource, ID.Reincarnation.Resource, ID.Reincarnation.Link,ID.status). ID.status is online if the link is functional; or else it isoffline.

Conversely, FIG. 7B illustrates the sequence of events that enable atask evaluator to come online, evaluate, when done, go offline, andfinally report the task's status back to the task scheduler (at theHub). First (708), a task is assigned by a task scheduler, and deliveredvia the link 413D to the main thread, where the Spoke waits in an evenloop inside the Task Kernel evaluator sub-module (411). Second (709),upon receiving this task, the content of the task is probed to determinethe type of the task; let T denote the type of the task. Next, the taskevaluator, of type T, (408B) and the corresponding communicationprimitives (409B) are enabled. Third (710), the correspondingcommunication primitives for type T (409C) on the daemon thread areenabled (409D) (by way of a message from 405 to 406). Fourth (711), theevaluator sub-module within 403T is invoked. Fifth (712), havingfinished evaluating the task, all primitives and functionality enabledin the previous steps are disabled. Finally (713), the status of thetask is reported back to the task scheduler using communicationprimitives 407B, and the Spoke event loop inside the Task Kernelevaluator sub-module (411), waiting for another task.

Finally, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art how steps(702, 703, 704, 706) and (709, 710, 712) need to be augmented as neededif the task scheduler/evaluator T provides access to communicationprimitives for the secondary topology.

Ability to Filter Stale Messages

There can be only one source of stale messages: ones from the Hub (viaone of the links labeled 413C) to some Spoke (via link 413D). Thecreation of each such link is initiated by the Spoke, details of whichwe shall cover later. Suffice it to say, once the link is established,the first message sent over the link is from the Spoke (over 413D) tothe Hub (over the just established link—one of 413C), and it containstwo numbers: ID.Resource, and ID.Reincarnation.Resource. The Hub, uponreceiving this message, associates a unique number,ID.Reincarnation.Link, with this newly established link.

The three attributes, ID.Resource, ID.Reincarnation.Resource, andID.Reincarnation.Link, form the basis by which stale messages getremoved at the Hub before they are transmitted to the Spoke. In otherwords, the headers for all messages meant for transmission over the link(413C) to the Spoke must have the same three attributes. Otherwise, themessages are simply discarded.

Therefore, the sources of all such messages need to be notified if, andwhen, the link goes both online and offline. There is one source forsuch messages: the sub-modules that implement communication primitivesacross all types of task scheduler and evaluators. This is achieved byhaving the tracker functionality propagate any change in status withrespect to any link (to the Spokes) to the Task Kernel modules on allthreads within a virtual thread, and whose details we covered whendescribing the enabling and disabling of non-tracker functionality inthe previous section.

Note that the Spokes cannot be the source of stale messages because: (a)the framework has the event loop for all task evaluators centralized at411, thus ensuring that there is only one way by which any taskevaluator can go offline—as long as this transition from online tooffline happens after all messages from the said task evaluator aresent; (b) communication primitives at the Hub can only reply; and (c)Tracker module (401) self destructs the virtual thread if link 413D isnon operational.

Finally, note that this method can be extended to filter stale messagesover any secondary topology, which should be recognized and be obviousto those skilled in the art.

Ability to Migrate Resources

The creation of a hierarchy of resources is achieved by migratingresources from a Hub to some of its Spoke(s), as depicted in FIGS. 8Aand 8B. A migration of resource is triggered by a task scheduler that isinvoked by a task evaluator at some Spoke. For example, Spoke S (802) isassigned a task by task scheduler A (804), which when evaluated resultsin the invocation of task scheduler B (806). At this point, the taskscheduler B needs resources in order to scheduler tasks. The only optionavailable, if no resources exist, is for it to ask for the resourcesfrom task scheduler A (804) by way of its caller (task evaluator A 805).Conversely, the opposite migration takes place when task scheduler B(806) is done scheduling tasks, and hence does not need the resourcesany more.

FIG. 8C illustrates an embodiment of how a resource is migrated from aparent Hub to its child Hub. First (808), a task scheduler, say, B asksfor a resources from its caller (task evaluator, say, A). Second (809),since the caller is a Spoke, and hence cannot have access to resources,it forwards the request to the task scheduler running on its Hub. Third(810), task scheduler A picks a free resource (one of its Spokes, say F)as a candidate for migration. Fourth (811), the task scheduler on Hub A(801) contacts its Tracker module on Hub A (801) to initiate themigration of Spoke F. Fifth (812), the Tracker module on Hub A (801)contacts the Tracker module on Spoke F (807) with the new coordinates(i.e. way by which to contact the Tracker module of its new Hub). Sixth(813), the Spoke F attempts to contact the Tracker on its new Hub(B—803). If the attempt is successful (814), the Tracker module runningon Spoke F replaces link to original Hub (A) with link to new Hub (B).On the other hand, if the attempt is not successful (815), an attempt ismade to re-establish link with the existing Hub (A); if attempt issuccessful (816), original link to Hub (A) is replaced with new link tothe same Hub (A), else (817) Tracker module self destructs the virtualthread.

The end result of a successful migration (814) is: (a) the generation ofa status report (by Tracker module at Hub A—801) containing attributesindicating that a link went offline, and (b) the generation of a statusreport (by Tracker module at Hub B—803) containing attributes indicatingthat a link went online. The end result of a failure to migrate is: (a)in case of both 816 and 817, the generation of a status report (byTracker module at Hub A—801) containing attributes indicating that alink went offline, followed by (b) in case of 816 only, the generationof a status report (by Tracker module at Hub A—801) containingattributes indicating that a link went online.

Finally, note that this method can be extended by those skilled in theart so that the request for migration can be forwarded up the hierarchy(i.e. to parent Hub of Hub A). Conversely, there are many ways by whicha resource can be giving up, and to which Hub.

Ability to Relaunch Resources In-Situ

FIG. 9 depicts the manner in which the Shadow launches, and if need be,relaunches the Hub or Spoke. Note that the Shadow is launched only once(901), and is provided with a unique number across all resources,ID.Resource. The Shadow, in turn, generates a number unique across alllaunches and relaunches of the Hub or Spoke (902),ID.Reincarnation.Resource. These two numbers, ID.Resource andID.Reincarnation.Resource, are made available to the Hub or Spoke (903).

FIG. 9 (903) depicts the normal or premature termination of the Hub orSpoke. In the case where the link is a pipe, message queue or socketbased on the, say, TCP/IP protocol, this termination manifests itself asan EOF on the link 904 (at Shadow)—904. Note that signals may also beutilized to detect the termination of either a child process (in case aShadow is a shadow process), or a child virtual thread (in case a Shadowis a shadow thread). At this point, the Shadow proceeds to clean up datastructures, and prepares to relaunch the resource by repeating step 902,only this time with another (different) ID.Reincarnation.Resourcenumber.

Note that since the default action of the shadow is to always relaunch aresource; the only way to break the cycle is for a resource to notifyits shadow to skip step 906 prior to termination. Furthermore, eachrelaunch is achieved in situ; i.e., without the Shadow having tocoordinate this relaunch with any other entity, process or resource.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an example computer system(1050) that may be used in connection with various embodiments describedherein. For example, the computer system (1050) may be used inconjunction with a parallel processing infrastructure. However, othercomputer systems and/or architectures may be used, as will become clearto those skilled in the art.

The computer system 1050 preferably includes one or more processors,such as processor 1052. Additional processors may be provided, such asan auxiliary processor to manage input/output, an auxiliary processor toperform floating point mathematical operations, a special-purposemicroprocessor having an architecture suitable for fast execution ofsignal processing algorithms (e.g., digital signal processor), a slaveprocessor subordinate to the main processing system (e.g., back-endprocessor), an additional microprocessor or controller for dual ormultiple processor systems, or a coprocessor. Such auxiliary processorsmay be discrete processors or may be integrated with the processor 1052.

The processor 1052 is preferably connected to a communication bus 1054.The communication bus 1054 may include a data channel for facilitatinginformation transfer between storage and other peripheral components ofthe computer system 1050. The communication bus 1054 further may providea set of signals used for communication with the processor 1052,including a data bus, address bus, and control bus (not shown). Thecommunication bus 1054 may comprise any standard or non-standard busarchitecture such as, for example, bus architectures compliant withindustry standard architecture (“ISA”), extended industry standardarchitecture (“EISA”), Micro Channel Architecture (“MCA”), peripheralcomponent interconnect (“PCI”) local bus, or standards promulgated bythe Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”) includingIEEE 488 general-purpose interface bus (“GPIB”), IEEE 696/S-100, and thelike.

Computer system 1050 preferably includes a main memory 1056 and may alsoinclude a secondary memory 1058. The main memory 1056 provides storageof instructions and data for programs executing on the processor 1052.The main memory 1056 is typically semiconductor-based memory such asdynamic random access memory (“DRAM”) and/or static random access memory(“SRAM”). Other semiconductor-based memory types include, for example,synchronous dynamic random access memory (“SDRAM”), Rambus dynamicrandom access memory (“RDRAM”), ferroelectric random access memory(“FRAM”), and the like, including read only memory (“ROM”).

The secondary memory 1058 may optionally include a hard disk drive 1060and/or a removable storage drive 1062, for example a floppy disk drive,a magnetic tape drive, a compact disc (“CD”) drive, a digital versatiledisc (“DVD”) drive, etc. The removable storage drive 1062 reads fromand/or writes to a removable storage medium 1064 in a well-known manner.Removable storage medium 1064 may be, for example, a floppy disk,magnetic tape, CD, DVD, etc.

The removable storage medium 1064 is preferably a computer readablemedium having stored thereon computer executable code (i.e., software)and/or data. The computer software or data stored on the removablestorage medium 1064 is read into the computer system 1050 as electricalcommunication signals 1078.

In alternative embodiments, secondary memory 1058 may include othersimilar means for allowing computer programs or other data orinstructions to be loaded into the computer system 1050. Such means mayinclude, for example, an external storage medium 1072 and an interface1070. Examples of external storage medium 1072 may include an externalhard disk drive or an external optical drive, or and externalmagneto-optical drive.

Other examples of secondary memory 1058 may include semiconductor-basedmemory such as programmable read-only memory (“PROM”), erasableprogrammable read-only memory (“EPROM”), electrically erasable read-onlymemory (“EEPROM”), or flash memory (block oriented memory similar toEEPROM). Also included are any other removable storage units 1072 andinterfaces 1070, which allow software and data to be transferred fromthe removable storage unit 1072 to the computer system 1050.

Computer system 1050 may also include a communication interface 1074.The communication interface 1074 allows software and data to betransferred between computer system 1050 and external devices (e.g.printers), networks, or information sources. For example, computersoftware or executable code may be transferred to computer system 1050from a network server via communication interface 1074. Examples ofcommunication interface 1074 include a modem, a network interface card(“NIC”), a communications port, a PCMCIA slot and card, an infraredinterface, and an IEEE 1394 fire-wire, just to name a few.

Communication interface 1074 preferably implements industry promulgatedprotocol standards, such as Ethernet IEEE 802 standards, Fiber Channel,digital subscriber line (“DSL”), asynchronous digital subscriber line(“ADSL”), frame relay, asynchronous transfer mode (“ATM”), integrateddigital services network (“ISDN”), personal communications services(“PCS”), transmission control protocol/Internet protocol (“TCP/IP”),serial line Internet protocol/point to point protocol (“SLIP/PPP”), andso on, but may also implement customized or non-standard interfaceprotocols as well.

Software and data transferred via communication interface 1074 aregenerally in the form of electrical communication signals 1078. Thesesignals 1078 are preferably provided to communication interface 1074 viaa communication channel 1076. Communication channel 1076 carries signals1078 and can be implemented using a variety of wired or wirelesscommunication means including wire or cable, fiber optics, conventionalphone line, cellular phone link, wireless data communication link, radiofrequency (RF) link, or infrared link, just to name a few.

Computer executable code (i.e., computer programs or software) is storedin the main memory 1056 and/or the secondary memory 1058. Computerprograms can also be received via communication interface 1074 andstored in the main memory 1056 and/or the secondary memory 1058. Suchcomputer programs, when executed, enable the computer system 1050 toperform the various functions of the present invention as previouslydescribed.

In this description, the term “computer readable medium” is used torefer to any media used to provide computer executable code (e.g.,software and computer programs) to the computer system 1050. Examples ofthese media include main memory 1056, secondary memory 1058 (includinghard disk drive 1060, removable storage medium 1064, and externalstorage medium 1072), and any peripheral device communicatively coupledwith communication interface 1074 (including a network informationserver or other network device). These computer readable mediums aremeans for providing executable code, programming instructions, andsoftware to the computer system 1050.

In an embodiment that is implemented using software, the software may bestored on a computer readable medium and loaded into computer system1050 by way of removable storage drive 1062, interface 1070, orcommunication interface 1074. In such an embodiment, the software isloaded into the computer system 1050 in the form of electricalcommunication signals 1078. The software, when executed by the processor1052, preferably causes the processor 1052 to perform the inventivefeatures and functions previously described herein.

While the particular system and method shown herein and described indetail is fully capable of attaining the above described objects of thisinvention, it is to be understood that the description and drawingspresented herein represent a presently preferred embodiment of theinvention, and are therefore, representative of the subject matter whichis broadly contemplated by the present invention. It is furtherunderstood that the scope of the present invention fully encompassesother embodiments that may become obvious to those skilled in the art.

Various embodiments may also be implemented primarily in hardware using,for example, components such as application specific integrated circuits(“ASICs”), or field programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”). Implementationof a hardware state machine capable of performing the functionsdescribed herein will also be apparent to those skilled in the relevantart. Various embodiments may also be implemented using a combination ofboth hardware and software.

Furthermore, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the variousillustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and method stepsdescribed in connection with the above described figures and theembodiments disclosed herein can often be implemented as electronichardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearlyillustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, variousillustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have beendescribed above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether suchfunctionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon theparticular application and design constraints imposed on the overallsystem. Skilled persons can implement the described functionality invarying ways for each particular application, but such implementationdecisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from thescope of the invention. In addition, the grouping of functions within amodule, block, circuit or step is for ease of description. Specificfunctions or steps can be moved from one module, block or circuit toanother without departing from the invention.

Moreover, the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and methodsdescribed in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can beimplemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digitalsignal processor (“DSP”), an ASIC, FPGA or other programmable logicdevice, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components,or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions describedherein. A general-purpose processor can be a microprocessor, but in thealternative, the processor can be any processor, controller,microcontroller, or state machine. A processor can also be implementedas a combination of computing devices, for example, a combination of aDSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or moremicroprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other suchconfiguration.

Additionally, the steps of a method or algorithm described in connectionwith the embodiments disclosed herein can be embodied directly inhardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in acombination of the two. A software module can reside in RAM memory,flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, harddisk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage mediumincluding a network storage medium. An exemplary storage medium can becoupled to the processor such the processor can read information from,and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, thestorage medium can be integral to the processor. The processor and thestorage medium can also reside in an ASIC.

The above description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enableany person skilled in the art to make or use the invention. Variousmodifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to thoseskilled in the art, and the generic principles described herein can beapplied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scopeof the invention. Thus, it is to be understood that the description anddrawings presented herein represent a presently preferred embodiment ofthe invention and are therefore representative of the subject matterwhich is broadly contemplated by the present invention. It is furtherunderstood that the scope of the present invention fully encompassesother embodiments that may become obvious to those skilled in the artand that the scope of the present invention is accordingly limited bynothing other than the appended claims.

1. A computer implemented method for parallel processing of computerinstructions on a plurality of processors located in one or morephysical machines that are communicatively coupled with each other via acommunication infrastructure, wherein the computer instructions arestored on a computer readable medium accessible by one or more of theprocessors, the method comprising: mapping a plurality of virtualprocessors to a plurality of processors; creating a parallel processingsession comprising the plurality of virtual processors; executing atracker module within said parallel processing session on one of saidplurality of virtual processors, the tracker module configured tocoordinate communication between tasks being evaluated by declaring anddefining communication primitives prior to a task evaluator comingonline; executing a plurality of task schedulers within said parallelprocessing session on said plurality of virtual processors, each taskscheduler configured to obtain resource processes from the trackermodule, said resource processes configured to evaluate one or moretasks; executing one or more task evaluators within said parallelprocessing session and under control of a task scheduler, wherein a taskevaluator executes a set of instructions that comprise a task;maintaining a hierarchical parallel processing infrastructure by thetracker module, said hierarchical parallel processing infrastructurecomprising a plurality of links between the plurality of taskschedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and the resource processes,wherein each link has an associated identifier; and addressingcommunications between the plurality of task schedulers, the one or moretask evaluators, and the resource processes using a combination of linkidentifiers.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising sending acommunication to the tracker module by a task scheduler to request anavailable resource process.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprisinggoing offline with a first task scheduler when execution of a last taskevaluator under control of the first task scheduler is complete whilecontinuing execution of the tracker module within the parallelprocessing session.
 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising goingonline with a second task scheduler while continuing execution of thetracker module within the parallel processing session.
 5. The method ofclaim 4, further comprising going offline with the second task schedulerwhen execution of a last task evaluator under control of the second taskscheduler is complete while continuing execution of the tracker modulewithin the parallel processing session.
 6. The method of claim 1,further comprising implementing a first predetermined policy throughexecution of a first task scheduler in the parallel processing sessionand implementing a second predetermined policy through execution of asecond task scheduler in the parallel processing session.
 7. The methodof claim 1, further comprising filtering communications by discardingcommunications having an invalid combination of link identifiers.
 8. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising changing the identifier associatedwith a link when a task evaluator goes offline and comes back online. 9.The method of claim 1, further comprising changing the identifierassociated with a link when a resource process is assigned from a firsttask evaluator to a second task evaluator.
 10. A non-transitory computerreadable medium having stored thereon code for causing a plurality ofprocessors to perform the steps for parallel processing, the stepscomprising: mapping a plurality of virtual processors to a plurality ofprocessors; creating a parallel processing session comprising theplurality of virtual processors; executing a tracker module within saidparallel processing session on one of said plurality of virtualprocessors, the tracker module configured to coordinate communicationbetween tasks being evaluated by declaring and defining communicationprimitives prior to a task evaluator coming online; executing aplurality of task schedulers within said parallel processing session onsaid plurality of virtual processors, each task scheduler configured toobtain resource processes from the tracker module, said resourceprocesses configured to evaluate one or more tasks; and executing one ormore task evaluators within said parallel processing session and undercontrol of a task scheduler, wherein a task evaluator executes a set ofinstructions that comprise a task; maintaining a hierarchical parallelprocessing infrastructure by the tracker module, said hierarchicalparallel processing infrastructure comprising a plurality of linksbetween the plurality of task schedulers, the one or more taskevaluators, and the resource processes, wherein each link has anassociated identifier; and addressing communications between theplurality of task schedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and theresource processes using a combination of link identifiers.
 11. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, further comprisingsending a communication to the tracker module by a task scheduler torequest an available resource process.
 12. The non-transitory computerreadable medium of claim 10, further comprising going offline with afirst task scheduler when execution of a last task evaluator undercontrol of the first task scheduler is complete while continuingexecution of the tracker module within the parallel processing session.13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, furthercomprising going online with a second task scheduler while continuingexecution of the tracker module within the parallel processing session.14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13, furthercomprising going offline with the second task scheduler when executionof a last task evaluator under control of the second task scheduler iscomplete while continuing execution of the tracker module within theparallel processing session.
 15. The non-transitory computer readablemedium of claim 10, further comprising implementing a firstpredetermined policy through execution of a first task scheduler in theparallel processing session and implementing a second predeterminedpolicy through execution of a second task scheduler in the parallelprocessing session.
 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium ofclaim 10, further comprising filtering communications by discardingcommunications having an invalid combination of link identifiers. 17.The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, furthercomprising changing the identifier associated with a link when a taskevaluator goes offline and comes back online.
 18. The non-transitorycomputer readable medium of claim 10, further comprising changing theidentifier associated with a link when a resource process is assignedfrom a first task evaluator to a second task evaluator.
 19. A technicalsystem for parallel processing of computer instructions on a pluralityof processors located in one or more physical machines that arecommunicatively coupled with each other via a communicationinfrastructure, wherein the computer instructions are stored on acomputer readable medium accessible by one or more of the processors,the technical system comprising: a plurality of processors configured toexecute computer instructions stored on a computer readable mediumaccessible by one or more of the plurality of processors; a plurality ofvirtual machines, each virtual machine having resource processes andeach resource process comprising a virtual thread having a main threadand a daemon thread; a task module configured to operate in the mainthread and schedule a plurality of tasks for evaluation, obtain resourceprocesses to evaluate the plurality of tasks, and evaluate the pluralityof tasks using the obtained resource processes; a tracker moduleconfigured to operate in the daemon thread and coordinate the assignmentof process resources to the task module and coordinate communicationbetween tasks being evaluated by declaring and defining communicationprimitives prior to a task evaluator coming online; wherein parallelprocessing utilizes the tracker module for tracking available resourceprocesses and utilizes the task module for scheduling and evaluatingtasks; wherein the tracker module is further configured to maintain ahierarchical structure of task schedulers and task evaluators comprisinga plurality of links between task schedulers, task evaluators, andresource processes, wherein each link has an associated identifier; andwherein the tracker module is further configured to coordinatecommunication between tasks by addressing communications using acombination of link identifiers.
 20. The system of claim 19, wherein thetask module comprises a task kernel that includes functionality that iscommon to all task schedulers and task evaluators.
 21. The system ofclaim 19, wherein the task module is configured to operate as a taskevaluator when executing a task and also configured to operate as a taskscheduler when coordinating the execution of a task.
 22. The system ofclaim 19, wherein the tracker module is further configured to filtercommunication between tasks by discarding communications with an invalidcombination of link identifiers.
 23. The system of claim 19, wherein thetracker module is further configured to change the identifier associatedwith a link when a task evaluator goes offline and comes back online.24. The system of claim 19, wherein the tracker module is furtherconfigured to change the identifier associated with a link when aresource process is assigned from a first task evaluator to a secondtask evaluator.
 25. A computer implemented method for parallelprocessing of computer instructions on a plurality of processors locatedin one or more physical machines that are communicatively coupled witheach other via a communication infrastructure, wherein the computerinstructions are stored on a computer readable medium accessible by oneor more of the processors, the method comprising: mapping a plurality ofvirtual processors to a plurality of processors; creating a parallelprocessing session comprising the plurality of virtual processors;executing a tracker module within said parallel processing session onone of said plurality of virtual processors, the tracker moduleconfigured to coordinate communication between tasks being evaluated bydeclaring and defining communication primitives prior to a taskevaluator coming online; executing a plurality of task schedulers withinsaid parallel processing session on said plurality of virtualprocessors, each task scheduler configured to obtain resource processesfrom the tracker module, said resource processes configured to evaluateone or more tasks; executing one or more task evaluators within saidparallel processing session and under control of a task scheduler,wherein a task evaluator executes a set of instructions that comprise atask; maintaining a hierarchical parallel processing infrastructure bythe tracker module, said hierarchical parallel processing infrastructurecomprising a plurality of links between the plurality of taskschedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and the resource processes,wherein each link has an associated identifier; and changing theidentifier associated with a link when a task evaluator goes offline andcomes back online.
 26. The method of claim 25, further comprisingsending a communication to the tracker module by a task scheduler torequest an available resource process.
 27. The method of claim 25,further comprising going offline with a first task scheduler whenexecution of a last task evaluator under control of the first taskscheduler is complete while continuing execution of the tracker modulewithin the parallel processing session.
 28. The method of claim 27,further comprising going online with a second task scheduler whilecontinuing execution of the tracker module within the parallelprocessing session.
 29. The method of claim 28, further comprising goingoffline with the second task scheduler when execution of a last taskevaluator under control of the second task scheduler is complete whilecontinuing execution of the tracker module within the parallelprocessing session.
 30. The method of claim 25, further comprisingimplementing a first predetermined policy through execution of a firsttask scheduler in the parallel processing session and implementing asecond predetermined policy through execution of a second task schedulerin the parallel processing session.
 31. The method of claim 25, furthercomprising addressing communications between the plurality of taskschedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and the resource processesusing a combination of link identifiers.
 32. The method of claim 25,further comprising filtering communications by discarding communicationshaving an invalid combination of link identifiers.
 33. The method ofclaim 25, further comprising changing the identifier associated with alink when a resource process is assigned from a first task evaluator toa second task evaluator.
 34. A computer implemented method for parallelprocessing of computer instructions on a plurality of processors locatedin one or more physical machines that are communicatively coupled witheach other via a communication infrastructure, wherein the computerinstructions are stored on a computer readable medium accessible by oneor more of the processors, the method comprising: mapping a plurality ofvirtual processors to a plurality of processors; creating a parallelprocessing session comprising the plurality of virtual processors;executing a tracker module within said parallel processing session onone of said plurality of virtual processors, the tracker moduleconfigured to coordinate communication between tasks being evaluated bydeclaring and defining communication primitives prior to a taskevaluator coming online; executing a plurality of task schedulers withinsaid parallel processing session on said plurality of virtualprocessors, each task scheduler configured to obtain resource processesfrom the tracker module, said resource processes configured to evaluateone or more tasks; executing one or more task evaluators within saidparallel processing session and under control of a task scheduler,wherein a task evaluator executes a set of instructions that comprise atask; maintaining a hierarchical parallel processing infrastructure bythe tracker module, said hierarchical parallel processing infrastructurecomprising a plurality of links between the plurality of taskschedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and the resource processes,wherein each link has an associated identifier; and changing theidentifier associated with a link when a resource process is assignedfrom a first task evaluator to a second task evaluator.
 35. The methodof claim 34, further comprising sending a communication to the trackermodule by a task scheduler to request an available resource process. 36.The method of claim 34, further comprising going offline with a firsttask scheduler when execution of a last task evaluator under control ofthe first task scheduler is complete while continuing execution of thetracker module within the parallel processing session.
 37. The method ofclaim 36, further comprising going online with a second task schedulerwhile continuing execution of the tracker module within the parallelprocessing session.
 38. The method of claim 37, further comprising goingoffline with the second task scheduler when execution of a last taskevaluator under control of the second task scheduler is complete whilecontinuing execution of the tracker module within the parallelprocessing session.
 39. The method of claim 34, further comprisingimplementing a first predetermined policy through execution of a firsttask scheduler in the parallel processing session and implementing asecond predetermined policy through execution of a second task schedulerin the parallel processing session.
 40. The method of claim 34, furthercomprising addressing communications between the plurality of taskschedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and the resource processesusing a combination of link identifiers.
 41. The method of claim 34,further comprising filtering communications by discarding communicationshaving an invalid combination of link identifiers.
 42. The method ofclaim 34, further comprising changing the identifier associated with alink when a task evaluator goes offline and comes back online.
 43. Anon-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon code forcausing a plurality of processors to perform the steps for parallelprocessing, the steps comprising: mapping a plurality of virtualprocessors to a plurality of processors; creating a parallel processingsession comprising the plurality of virtual processors; executing atracker module within said parallel processing session on one of saidplurality of virtual processors, the tracker module configured tocoordinate communication between tasks being evaluated by declaring anddefining communication primitives prior to a task evaluator comingonline; executing a plurality of task schedulers within said parallelprocessing session on said plurality of virtual processors, each taskscheduler configured to obtain resource processes from the trackermodule, said resource processes configured to evaluate one or moretasks; executing one or more task evaluators within said parallelprocessing session and under control of a task scheduler, wherein a taskevaluator executes a set of instructions that comprise a task;maintaining a hierarchical parallel processing infrastructure by thetracker module, said hierarchical parallel processing infrastructurecomprising a plurality of links between the plurality of taskschedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and the resource processes,wherein each link has an associated identifier; and changing theidentifier associated with a link when a task evaluator goes offline andcomes back online.
 44. The non-transitory computer readable medium ofclaim 43, further comprising sending a communication to the trackermodule by a task scheduler to request an available resource process. 45.The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 43, furthercomprising going offline with a first task scheduler when execution of alast task evaluator under control of the first task scheduler iscomplete while continuing execution of the tracker module within theparallel processing session.
 46. The non-transitory computer readablemedium of claim 45, further comprising going online with a second taskscheduler while continuing execution of the tracker module within theparallel processing session.
 47. The non-transitory computer readablemedium of claim 46, further comprising going offline with the secondtask scheduler when execution of a last task evaluator under control ofthe second task scheduler is complete while continuing execution of thetracker module within the parallel processing session.
 48. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 43, further comprisingimplementing a first predetermined policy through execution of a firsttask scheduler in the parallel processing session and implementing asecond predetermined policy through execution of a second task schedulerin the parallel processing session.
 49. The non-transitory computerreadable medium of claim 43, further comprising addressingcommunications between the plurality of task schedulers, the one or moretask evaluators, and the resource processes using a combination of linkidentifiers.
 50. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim43, further comprising filtering communications by discardingcommunications having an invalid combination of link identifiers. 51.The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 43, furthercomprising changing the identifier associated with a link when aresource process is assigned from a first task evaluator to a secondtask evaluator.
 52. A non-transitory computer readable medium havingstored thereon code for causing a plurality of processors to perform thesteps for parallel processing, the steps comprising: mapping a pluralityof virtual processors to a plurality of processors; creating a parallelprocessing session comprising the plurality of virtual processors;executing a tracker module within said parallel processing session onone of said plurality of virtual processors, the tracker moduleconfigured to coordinate communication between tasks being evaluated bydeclaring and defining communication primitives prior to a taskevaluator coming online; executing a plurality of task schedulers withinsaid parallel processing session on said plurality of virtualprocessors, each task scheduler configured to obtain resource processesfrom the tracker module, said resource processes configured to evaluateone or more tasks; executing one or more task evaluators within saidparallel processing session and under control of a task scheduler,wherein a task evaluator executes a set of instructions that comprise atask; maintaining a hierarchical parallel processing infrastructure bythe tracker module, said hierarchical parallel processing infrastructurecomprising a plurality of links between the plurality of taskschedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and the resource processes,wherein each link has an associated identifier; and changing theidentifier associated with a link when a resource process is assignedfrom a first task evaluator to a second task evaluator.
 53. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 52, further comprisingsending a communication to the tracker module by a task scheduler torequest an available resource process.
 54. The non-transitory computerreadable medium of claim 52, further comprising going offline with afirst task scheduler when execution of a last task evaluator undercontrol of the first task scheduler is complete while continuingexecution of the tracker module within the parallel processing session.55. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 54, furthercomprising going online with a second task scheduler while continuingexecution of the tracker module within the parallel processing session.56. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 55, furthercomprising going offline with the second task scheduler when executionof a last task evaluator under control of the second task scheduler iscomplete while continuing execution of the tracker module within theparallel processing session.
 57. The non-transitory computer readablemedium of claim 52, further comprising implementing a firstpredetermined policy through execution of a first task scheduler in theparallel processing session and implementing a second predeterminedpolicy through execution of a second task scheduler in the parallelprocessing session.
 58. The non-transitory computer readable medium ofclaim 52, further comprising addressing communications between theplurality of task schedulers, the one or more task evaluators, and theresource processes using a combination of link identifiers.
 59. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 52, further comprisingfiltering communications by discarding communications having an invalidcombination of link identifiers.
 60. The non-transitory computerreadable medium of claim 52, further comprising changing the identifierassociated with a link when a task evaluator goes offline and comes backonline.
 61. A technical system for parallel processing of computerinstructions on a plurality of processors located in one or morephysical machines that are communicatively coupled with each other via acommunication infrastructure, wherein the computer instructions arestored on a computer readable medium accessible by one or more of theprocessors, the technical system comprising: a plurality of processorsconfigured to execute computer instructions stored on a computerreadable medium accessible by one or more of the plurality ofprocessors; a plurality of virtual machines, each virtual machine havingresource processes and each resource process comprising a virtual threadhaving a main thread and a daemon thread; a task module configured tooperate in the main thread and schedule a plurality of tasks forevaluation, obtain resource processes to evaluate the plurality oftasks, and evaluate the plurality of tasks using the obtained resourceprocesses; a tracker module configured to operate in the daemon threadand coordinate the assignment of process resources to the task moduleand coordinate communication between tasks being evaluated by declaringand defining communication primitives prior to a task evaluator comingonline; wherein parallel processing utilizes the tracker module fortracking available resource processes and utilizes the task module forscheduling and evaluating tasks; wherein the tracker module is furtherconfigured to maintain a hierarchical structure of task schedulers andtask evaluators comprising a plurality of links between task schedulers,task evaluators, and resource processes, wherein each link has anassociated identifier; and wherein the tracker module is furtherconfigured to change the identifier associated with a link when a taskevaluator goes offline and comes back online.
 62. The system of claim61, wherein the task module comprises a task kernel that includesfunctionality that is common to all task schedulers and task evaluators.63. The system of claim 61, wherein the task module is configured tooperate as a task evaluator when executing a task and also configured tooperate as a task scheduler when coordinating the execution of a task.64. The system of claim 61, wherein the tracker module is furtherconfigured to coordinate communication between tasks by addressingcommunications using a combination of link identifiers.
 65. The systemof claim 61, wherein the tracker module is further configured to filtercommunication between tasks by discarding communications with an invalidcombination of link identifiers.
 66. The system of claim 61, wherein thetracker module is further configured to change the identifier associatedwith a link when a resource process is assigned from a first taskevaluator to a second task evaluator.
 67. A technical system forparallel processing of computer instructions on a plurality ofprocessors located in one or more physical machines that arecommunicatively coupled with each other via a communicationinfrastructure, wherein the computer instructions are stored on acomputer readable medium accessible by one or more of the processors,the technical system comprising: a plurality of processors configured toexecute computer instructions stored on a computer readable mediumaccessible by one or more of the plurality of processors; a plurality ofvirtual machines, each virtual machine having resource processes andeach resource process comprising a virtual thread having a main threadand a daemon thread; a task module configured to operate in the mainthread and schedule a plurality of tasks for evaluation, obtain resourceprocesses to evaluate the plurality of tasks, and evaluate the pluralityof tasks using the obtained resource processes; a tracker moduleconfigured to operate in the daemon thread and coordinate the assignmentof process resources to the task module and coordinate communicationbetween tasks being evaluated by declaring and defining communicationprimitives prior to a task evaluator coming online; wherein parallelprocessing utilizes the tracker module for tracking available resourceprocesses and utilizes the task module for scheduling and evaluatingtasks; wherein the tracker module is further configured to maintain ahierarchical structure of task schedulers and task evaluators comprisinga plurality of links between task schedulers, task evaluators, andresource processes, wherein each link has an associated identifier; andwherein the tracker module is further configured to change theidentifier associated with a link when a resource process is assignedfrom a first task evaluator to a second task evaluator.
 68. The systemof claim 67, wherein the task module comprises a task kernel thatincludes functionality that is common to all task schedulers and taskevaluators.
 69. The system of claim 67, wherein the task module isconfigured to operate as a task evaluator when executing a task and alsoconfigured to operate as a task scheduler when coordinating theexecution of a task.
 70. The system of claim 67, wherein the trackermodule is further configured to coordinate communication between tasksby addressing communications using a combination of link identifiers.71. The system of claim 67, wherein the tracker module is furtherconfigured to filter communication between tasks by discardingcommunications with an invalid combination of link identifiers.
 72. Thesystem of claim 67 wherein the tracker module is further configured tochange the identifier associated with a link when a task evaluator goesoffline and comes back online.